|
|
|
|
|
CHAPTER FOUR
MESSIAH A DESCENDANT OF DAVID
In the preceding chapter we traced the unfolding of the messianic idea through the Torah, concluding, however, with Hannah's Song of Praise. When David became established as king in Israel, the messianic ideal settled down upon him. This definite advance in the development of the doctrine was the result of the covenant which the Lord made with him and his seed.
I. THE DAVIDIC COVENANT
Having been securely established as king over the twelve tribes and having taken up his residence in his newly built royal palace, David, with a sense of propriety and the fitness of things, felt that it was improper for him thus to dwell in luxury and splendor while the ark of his God remained in a tent. Therefore having purposed to build a temple for the glory of God, in which the ark should be deposited, he divulged his plans to the prophet Nathan. The royal design appealed to him greatly, and immediately he encouraged the king to proceed with the proposed construction. That night, however, the word of the Lord came to the prophet, rebuking him for his hasty approval of his master's plans, making known to him the divine decree which cancelled* the royal proposal, and making a special revelation concerning the permanent establishment of Israel in the Promised Land and the perpetuity of the Davidic dynasty.
A. Reaffirmation of the Land Promise
To the call of God Abraham immediately responded (Gen. 12:1-8). At this time the Lord made a sevenfold promise.
"Now the Lord said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's house, unto the land that I will show thee: and I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and be thou a blessing: and I will bless them that bless thee, and him that curseth thee will I curse: and in thee shall all the families of the earth be blessed" (Gen. 12:1-3). Not one item of this divine guarantee of future greatness and blessing has been realized to the degree contemplated in the passage. It is certain, however, that each has had a limited and imperfect fulfillment. But since God is faithful and will redeem His every pledge, we may confidently expect to see the accomplishment of the promise in each detail and in the degree indicated. A careful reading of Israel's history reveals the fact that the full enjoyment of the promises and the blessings of God is conditioned upon an unswerving faith in Him and absolute obedience to His Word. Such a study emphasizes the further fact that at no time in the past, nor at present, has she been true and faithful to her God. Her failure fully accounts for the non-realization of this covenant. In the 26th chapter of Leviticus, spoken at Sinai at the time of the exodus, appears a graphic outline of Israel's checkered history from that date to the time when God shall remember His covenant made with Abraham, confirmed to Isaac, and reaffirmed to Jacob. "And they shall confess their iniquity, and the iniquity of their fathers, in their trespass which they trespassed against me, and also that, because they walked contrary unto me, I also walked contrary unto them, and brought them into the land of their enemies: if then their uncircumcised heart be humbled, and they then accept of the punishment of their iniquity; then will I remember my covenant with Jacob; and also my covenant with Isaac, and also my covenant with Abraham will I remember; and I will remember the land. The land also shall be left by them, and shall enjoy its sabbaths, while it lieth desolate without them: and they shall accept of the punishment of their iniquity; because, even because they rejected mine ordinances, and their soul abhorred my statutes. And yet for all that, when they are in the land of their enemies, I will not reject them, neither will I abhor them, to destroy them utterly, and to break my covenant with them; for I am the Lord their God; but I will for their sakes remember the covenant of their ancestors, whom I brought forth out of the land of Egypt in the sight of the nations, that I might be their God: I am the Lord" (Lev. 26:40-45). Israel's history from the deliverance of the nation out of Egyptian bondage to the present moment corresponds accurately to the divinely inspired forecast. Since her tortuous past is an exact replica of the prediction, we may logically conclude that the future will likewise vindicate the prophecy by a literal fulfillment. Hence a full enjoyment and an entering into the realization of the covenant blessings are contingent upon the acknowledgment which Moses says the nation shall make. This confession consists of two parts: first, acknowledgment of the national sin, "And they shall confess their (the generation making the confession) iniquity, and the iniquity of their fathers (the ancestors of the penitential generation), in their (fathers is antecedent of their) trespass which they trespassed against me"; secondly, acknowledgment of the penalty of the sin, "and also that, because they (the fathers) walked contrary unto me, I also walked contrary unto them, and brought them into the land of their enemies." When the nation shall have repented of and confessed this national sin committed by the fathers while in the land and shared by their descendants in the lands of enemies, God will remember the covenant and the land promise. Then the Lord will fulfill to the letter every item of the sevenfold blessing vouchsafed. Israel in the land has always enjoyed these blessings to the extent of her obedience, full participation being hindered by her frequent unfaithfulness. From the study of the passage examined above and a comparison of it with the land promise made by Nathan to David, it is evident that Nathan was speaking of this very promise the fulfillment of which will immediately follow this national humiliation and repentance. The natural import of the language of Leviticus 26:40-45 is that the final and permanent establishment of the children of Israel in the land of their fathers is definitely foretold. A comparison of these verses with Nathan's prediction is conclusive on this point. "And I will appoint a place for my people Israel, and will plant them, that they may dwell in their own place, and be moved no more; neither shall the children of wickedness afflict them any more, as at the first, and as from the day that I commanded judges to be over my people Israel; and I will cause thee to rest from all thine enemies" (2 Sam. 7:10,11a). A comparison of this promise with many others shows that the land in which the Jewish people will be settled permanently is Palestine--"in their own place." This land is by divine decree the property of Israel. When she is thus established in the home of the fathers, she shall "be moved no more; neither shall the children of wickedness afflict them any more, as at the first, and as from the day that I commanded judges to be over my people Israel." Therefore we see that the great final restoration and permanent establishment of Israel in the land of the fathers form the first part of Nathan's prediction.
B. The Perpetuity of the Davidic Dynasty
"When thy days are fulfilled, and thou shalt sleep with thy fathers, I will set up thy seed after thee, that shall proceed out of thy bowels, and I will establish his kingdom. He shall build a house for my name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom for ever. I will be his father, and he shall be my son: if he commit iniquity, I will chasten him with the rod of men, and with the stripes of the children of men; but my lovingkindness shall not depart from him, as I took it from Saul, whom I put away before thee. And thy house and thy kingdom shall be made sure for ever before thee: thy throne shall be established for ever" (2 Sam. 7:12-16). Since the land promise and the guarantee of Israel's future permanent possession of it precede the prediction concerning the Davidic dynasty, throne, and kingdom, and since, as we see from the quotation above, they are to continue "for ever," we may be absolutely certain that this oracle reaches into the future and includes the time when Israel, after her confession, is established in her land permanently and peacefully enjoys the fruit of her labors. Inasmuch as she will never be moved from it when the prophecy is fulfilled and the dynasty, throne, and kingdom of David are to continue "for ever" (nothing in this context nor in any parallel passage limits the expression for ever), one must understand that this prediction sweeps out into the future to the end of all earthly affairs.¹
Special attention must be given to verses 14-16. That Solomon stands in the foreground of verse 14 is evident from the details of the preceding verse, which mentions David's seed that should proceed out of his loins. Upon the death of his father, Solomon ascended the throne. Against the machinations of Adonijah (I Kings 2:13f) the Lord protected him so that he was able to say, "The Lord hath established his word that he spake; for I am risen up in the room of David my father" (I Kings 8:20). He built the temple as the Lord had foretold (I Kings 6:1; 8:15ff). In his old age he fell into gross idolatry, importing the foreign gods worshiped by his wives and building sanctuaries for them in the environs of Jerusalem. After his death the punishment came in the form of the rending of the kingdom by the revolt of the ten northern tribes. Thus the Lord punished him with the rods of men but did not withdraw His grace from him. Notwithstanding the unmistakable reference to Solomon in these verses, the promises sweep out far beyond the life and times of this monarch. As evidence of this fact, note the threefold repetition of forever, the eternal duration of the seed of David, and the promise of the establishment of the throne and kingdom forever, which predictions incontrovertibly point beyond the time of Solomon. The word seed refers to one's posterity and may indicate a single son, several children, or a succession of generations. The thought of its referring to several persons of the same generation is precluded by the fact that only one of David's descendants could sit upon the throne at a given time. Furthermore the idea of a succession of descendants is contained in the promise that the Lord would not withdraw His favor from David's posterity as He had taken it from Saul. The Lord declared that in case any of his sons should commit iniquity He would punish the disobedience but would continue His favor, transmitting it from father to son. In this connection it becomes necessary to reemphasize the force of forever. As seen in footnote, 1, forever is limited by the data supplied in the context. In some instances it signifies eternal duration whereas in other passages it indicates a limited time. In Psalm 89:29, a passage dealing with this very promise, the Lord declared concerning David that, "His seed also will I make to endure forever, And his throne as the days of heaven." The parallel structure of this verse defines the meaning of forever, namely, as the days of heaven. Therefore the original promise relative to the continuance of David's seed guarantees the perpetuity of his dynasty as long as day and night continue. Since the throne and kingdom along with the seed of David are, according to this promise, to continue forever, we may be certain that they will continue as long as time on this earth lasts. "His seed shall endure for ever, And his throne as the sun before me" (Ps. 89:36). Dr. C. F. Keil, in his excellent commentary on II Samuel, thoroughly discussed the meaning of the promise relative to the perpetuity of the Davidic dynasty and throne. "No earthly kingdom, and no posterity of any single man, has eternal duration like the heaven and the earth; but the different families of men become extinct, as the different earthly kingdoms perish, and other families and kingdoms take their place. The posterity of David, therefore, could only last forever by running out in a person who lives for ever, i.e., by culminating in the Messiah, who lives for ever, and of whose kingdom there is no end." History verifies Dr. Keil's contention. For instance, look at the table of nations given in the Torah (Gen. 10). Nearly every one of these peoples has passed into oblivion. Even the few which have survived to the present have undergone many changes by the introduction of new blood, by political upheavals, by conquests, and by changes in general. These changes and modifications have been so very great in the few cases surviving that they can hardly be recognized as the descendants of their ancient progenitors. And even among those which by a great stretch of the imagination may lay claim to a shadowy and doubtful identity with the past, there is not a single nation in which the royal house has continued to the present in unbroken succession. Israel though a nation is not to be numbered with other peoples (Num. 23:9). She is not amenable² to the inviolable laws governing other nations. Her history from the call of Abraham to the present has constituted the abiding miracle in the presence of the peoples of earth. Laws higher than those operating among the Gentiles have kept and preserved the Chosen People to the present hour. Had this nation not been protected by the special providence of the Almighty, it would be but a memory. But in order that all families of the earth may be blessed, God has preserved it to the present and will continue to do so as long as time lasts. The God of Israel, the author of the special providences preserving the nation, promises, in the passage under review, the same protection to, preservation and perpetuity of the royal house of David. The fulfillment of this promise immediately becomes evident by comparing the history of the changing dynasties in Samaria with the unbroken succession of the Davidic house in Jerusalem. The same political storms and military gales that constantly wrecked the kingdom of Ephraim and brought about a change of dynasty beat with equal force against the little kingdom of Judah and the royal house of David, yet during all that time this divinely chosen dynasty remained intact. Even the collapse of Judah at the hands of Nebuchadnezzar and the consequent Babylonian exile were not infractions of the inviolability of the covenant with David. They constituted chastisement for iniquity but not the withdrawal of favor from the reigning house. Zerubbabel who led the captives back from Babylon and supervised the restoration of the Davidic kingdom was a prince of the house of David, the rightful heir to the throne. Though restored to national life under Cyrus the Persian, Judah never again enjoyed political independence except for a very brief time under the leadership of the Maccabees. During the supremacy of Persia, Greece, and Rome, even to the destruction of the national life by Titus, Judah remained, in succession, a subject of each of these great powers. This foreign domination constituted the chastisement mentioned in the promise, yet the house of David continued even to the destruction of Jerusalem in the year 70 of the common era, as is evident from the genealogical tables. Therefore the covenant remains unbroken and continues intact. Dr. Keil has shown us in the quotation above that the only way in which the house of David can continue forever is by its ending in a single person who lives forever. The only one in which the line can thus culminate is Messiah whose nature and person, as we have already seen, make His living forever possible. Hence we must conclude that, though Solomon stood in the foreground of this prophetic picture, Messiah in His glory and power appeared on the distant horizon. Between them, however, was seen the succession of Davidic princes who in an imperfect manner typified Him and above whom He towered in grandeur and excellence.
C. An Inspired Interpretation of the Davidic Covenant
In the preceding section we learned that the covenant made by the Lord with David vouchsafed to him the perpetuity of his house and that this continuity is accomplished by the running out of the royal line in a person who lives forever, that is, "by culminating in the Messiah, who lives for ever, and of whose kingdom there is no end." In thus interpreting this passage I endeavored to ascertain only the facts of the context and their implications. It is now proper to test the conclusions reached by comparing them with the inspired interpretation given by the sacred historian in I Chronicles 17. All of the facts preserved to us indicate that the chronicler wrote his history after the Babylonian captivity. (See II Chronicles 36:22,23.) Therefore approximately five hundred years intervened between the making of the covenant and the writing of Chronicles. Some of the details given in the original of II Samuel 7 are omitted from the Chronicles account. This phenomenon is to be expected. According to the laws of evidence, which may be examined in any standard work on the subject, the testimony of witnesses which agrees in the main but differs in details is of the highest order. The agreement is due to the sameness of the person or thing to which testimony is borne, whereas the differences are traceable to the individualities and experiences of the witnesses. A recognition of this fact and an application of the laws of evidence bearing on the points involved satisfactorily explain the seeming discrepancies. One of the basic principles of the gradual unfolding of the revelation of God throws additional light upon the differences between the original covenant and the chronicler's version of it. The Lord, our maker, understands psychology and the best method of presenting His truth to us. According to the fundamentals of this science, the efficient teacher advances from the simple to the complex, from the near to the remote, and from the general to the specific. Thus the divine Spirit in the original statement of the covenant laid the emphasis upon the simple, the near, and the general (II Sam. 7), but in His later utterance (I Chron. 17), which assumes the development we know took place during the five hundred intervening years, He dealt with the complex, the remote, and the specific. As we shall see in the discussion of the predictions of Isaiah, an advance was made during the monarchal period of Israel's history toward the completion of the portrait of Messiah. Hence the definiteness of the revelations made concerning Him in this intervening period should appear in the chronicler's version. We should be disappointed indeed had he lagged behind the development and presented the exact portrait found in Samuel's account. On the contrary, as we shall presently see, the divine Spirit presented through him a portrait of Messiah in keeping with the development of his day.
1. Discussion of vital variations
II Sam. 7:12-16
"When thy days are fulfilled, and thou shalt sleep with thy fathers, I will set up thy seed after thee, that shall proceed out of thy bowels, and I will establish his kingdom. He shall build a house for my name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever. I will be his father, and he shall be my son: if he commit iniquity I will chasten him with the rod of men, and with the stripes of the children of men; but my lovingkindness shall not depart from him, as I took it from Saul, whom I put away before thee. And thy house and thy kingdom shall be made sure for ever before thee: thy throne shall be established forever."
כִּי יִמְלְאוּ יָמֶיךָ וְשָׁכַבְתָּ אֶת־אֲבֹתֶיךָ וַהֲקִימֹתִי אֶת־זַרְעֲךָ אַחֲרֶיךָ אֲשֶׁר יֵצֵא מִמֵּעֶיךָ וַהֲכִינֹתִי אֶת־מַמְלַכְתּוֹ׃ הוּא יִבְנֶה־בַּיִת לִשְׁמִי וְכֹנַנְתִּי אֶת־כִּסֵּא מַמְלַכְתּוֹ עַד־עוֹלָם׃ אֲנִי אֶהְיֶה־לּוֹ לְאָב וְהוּא יִהְיֶה־לִּי לְבֵן אֲשֶׁר בְּהַעֲוֹתוֹ וְהֹכַחְתִּיו בְּשֵׁבֶט אֲנָשִׁים וּבְנִגְעֵי בְּנֵי אָדָם׃ וְחַסְדִּי לֹא־יָסוּר מִמֶּנּוּ כַּאֲשֶׁר הֲסִרֹתִי מֵעִם שָׁאוּל אֲשֶׁר הֲסִרֹתִי מִלְּפָנֶיךָ׃ וְנֶאְמַן בֵּיתְךָ וּמַמְלַכְתְּךָ עַד־עוֹלָם לְפָנֶיךָ: כִּסְאֲךָ יִהְיֶה נָכוֹן עַד־עוֹלָם׃
I Chron. 17:11-14.
"And it shall come to pass, when thy days are fulfilled that thou must go to be with thy fathers, that I will set up thy seed after thee, who shall be of thy sons; and I will establish his kingdom. He shall build me a house, and I will establish his throne forever. I will be his father and he shall be my son: and I will not take my lovingkindness away from him, as I took it from him that was before thee; but I will settle him in my house and in my kingdom for ever; and his throne shall be established for ever."
וְהָיָה כִּי־מָלְאוּ יָמֶיךָ לָלֶכֶת עִם־אֲבֹתֶיךָ וַהֲקִימוֹתִי אֶת־זַרְעֲךָ אַחֲרֶיךָ אֲשֶׁר יִהְיֶה מִבָּנֶיךָ וַהֲכִינוֹתִי אֶת־מַלְכוּתוֹ׃ הוּא יִבְנֶה־לִּי בָּיִת וְכֹנַנְתִּי אֶת־כִּסְאוֹ עַד־עוֹלָם׃ אֲנִי אֶהְיֶה־לּוֹ לְאָב וְהוּא יִהְיֶה־לִּי לְבֵן וְחַסְדִּי לֹא־אָסִיר מֵעִמּוֹ כַּאֲשֶׁר הֲסִירוֹתִי מֵאֲשֶׁר הָיָה לְפָנֶיךָ׃ וְהַעֲמַדְתִּיהוּ בְּבֵיתִי וּבְמַלְכוּתִי עַד־הָעוֹלָם וְכִסְאוֹ יִהְיֶה נָכוֹן עַד־עוֹלָם׃
Omitting minor and unimportant differences in phraseology which do not affect the interpretation and which I pass by as having no bearing upon the subject in hand, I will endeavor to examine those that are vital. The first variation to be noted relates to the one who is to sit upon the throne of David forever. In Samuel the Lord identified him as the one אֲשֶׁר יֵצֵא מִמֵּעֶיךָ "that shall proceed out of thy bowels"; but in the Chronicles account He described him to David as the one אֲשֶׁר יִהְיֶה מִבָּנֶיךָ "who shall be of thy sons." The Samuel account without doubt refers primarily to one of David's own sons, Solomon. But as we have already seen, the description sweeps out into the distant future so that it cannot be limited to Solomon though he appears in the immediate foreground. The chronicler used an expression that eliminated Solomon from the picture, for in his day the messianic ideal had advanced far beyond the doctrinal development of Samuel's time. Had he desired to say, as some contend, "thy seed, which shall be among thy sons," he would have said זַרְעֲךָ אֲשֶׁר מִבָּנֶיךָ . On the contrary, he used the following words זַרְעֲךָ אֲשֶׁר יִהְיֶה מִבָּנֶיךָ which are properly translated "thy seed, which will come out of (from) thy sons." "For הָיָה מִן does not denote to be of one, i.e., to belong to him, but to arise, be born, or go forth, from one: cf. Gen. 17:16, Eccles. 3:20." This position becomes still more apparent when we examine the word מִבָּנֶיךָ "from thy sons." The context indicates that זַרְעֲךָ should be understood as a singular noun referring to one person. Also the facts under consideration confirm this interpretation since only one person could sit upon the throne at a given time. If we should understand thy sons to refer to David's own children and not to his descendants after the first generation, we would understand that the Lord was speaking of one individual as begotten by David's sons. This position is preposterous. Therefore מִבָּנֶיךָ can refer only to the line of the princes of Judah. Since this one who is called David's seed par excellence is in the princely line, and since He mounts the throne in proper succession and remains there forever, it follows that with Him the Davidic dynasty runs out. These facts show beyond a peradventure that the inspired writer of Chronicles interpreted the original promise as messianic. Dr. Keil confirms the conclusions just reached. "According to this, the linguistically correct translation, the words cannot be referred to Solomon at all, because Solomon was not a descendant of David's sons, but of David himself. The author of the Chronicle has interpreted אֶת־זַרְעֲךָ אַחֲרֶיךָ theologically, or rather set forth the Messianic contents of this conception more clearly than it was expressed in אֲשֶׁר יֵצֵא מִמֵּעֶיךָ. The seed after David, which will arise from his sons, is the Messiah, whom the prophets announced as the Son of David, whose throne God will establish for ever (ver. 12). This Messianic interpretation of David's זֶרַע explains the divergence of the chronicler's text in vers. 13 and 14 from 2 Sam. vii. 14-16. For instance, the omission of the words after בֵּן in ver. 13, 'If he commit iniquity, I will chasten him with the rod of men' (II Sam. 7:14), is the result of the Messianic interpretation of זַרְעֲךָ, since the reference to the chastisement would of course be important for the earthly sons of David and the kings of Judah, but could not well find place in the case of the Messiah. The only thing said of this son of David is, that God will not withdraw His grace from him."--Commentary on Chronicles, p. 223. The second variation to be noted is found by a comparison of II Samuel 7:16 and I Chronicles 17:14. The original statement, "And thy house and thy kingdom shall be made sure for ever before thee: thy throne shall be established for ever," is limited and narrowed down by the chronicler to the Messiah: "But I will settle him in my house and in my kingdom for ever; and his throne shall be established for ever." The original statement is general; the later one is specific. The words quoted from the Samuel passage were spoken to David; those in the Chronicles refer to the seed of David, the Messiah, and "promise to Him His establishment for ever in the house and kingdom of God, and the duration of His throne for ever." According to this promise, God will establish Messiah in His house. What is meant by בֵּית house? It cannot, as some contend, refer to the kingdom of Israel for this significance was never in Tenach attached to it. The context must decide. In verse 12 house refers to the temple of the Lord. Since there is nothing in either verse 13 or 14 to indicate a change of meaning, we must understand it to have the same signification. The temple in Jerusalem stood related to the kingdom of God as the king's palace to his realm. The house which the Messiah will build will stand in the same relation to the great kingdom of God of the future; hence it will be the house of the Lord in His kingdom. In this house and kingdom the Lord God will establish Messiah forever. His throne shall never topple; His reign shall never cease, because He Himself shall live forever. These words are applicable to none other than King Messiah. I will now close this phase of the investigation by quoting once more from Dr. Keil. "The words are therefore merely a further development of the saying, 'I will be to him a Father, and I will not take my mercy away from him, and will establish his kingdom for ever,' and tell us clearly and definitely what is simplicity contained in the promise, that David's house, kingdom, and throne will endure for ever (Sam.), viz. that the house and kingdom of David will be established for ever only under the Messiah. That this interpretation is correct is proved by the fact that the divergences of the text of the chronicler from the parallel narrative cannot otherwise be explained." Another remarkable variation is the omission of the clause, "if he commit iniquity, I will chasten him with the rod of men, and with the stripes of the children of men." Why this striking literary phenomenon? Was the dropping of these words accidental or intentional? Since the chronicler erased the Davidic dynasty from the picture in the Samuel account and left only that of King Messiah, and since he gave a distinct picture of Him, one naturally concludes that the removal of this clause was intentional. As we shall learn later, Messiah shall be called "the Lord our righteousness" when He mounts the throne of David. In the light of this prophecy and many others it is evident that He is righteous in the absolute sense of the term. Hence the omission of this conditional clause from the statements relative to the Messiah alone is intentional. This fact also is strong evidence of His sinless nature.
Footnotes:
* Nathan in acquiescing with the king's proposal was not speaking as a prophet but simply as a man to his friend. During the following night the Spirit of God showed him the mistake he had made and required him to deliver the divine revelation making void his advice humanly given and unfolding further the eternal purposes of God concerning Israel and her future King. When a prophet spoke as God's representative, his message was infallible. Every word either has been or shall be fulfilled to the very letter. For absolute proof of this proposition see Urquhart's Wonders of Prophecy. History confirms this verdict. Hence when God makes a statement, it shall be even as it has been spoken.
¹ The Hebrew language has no word that corresponds exactly to the English forever, or everlasting. The word עוֹלָם, 'olam' and various combinations of it together with some other expressions do indicate indefinite continuity unless something in the context limits its meaning or unless its significance is prescribed and conditioned by the thing with which it is bound. For instance, in Isaiah 32:14 the desolation of the land of Palestine and of the city of Jerusalem are said to be for ever. The next verse however, limits for ever by the word until. On the other hand, since the continuance of Israel in the land of the fathers and the perpetuity of the Davidic house, throne, and kingdom are conditioned by the duration of the earth, we logically conclude that the fulfillment of this promise continues to the end of the existence of the earth.
² In the worldwide depression Palestine alone is not affected. On the contrary, the period of international, economic distress and business chaos has proved to be an era of prosperity for the Holy Land under Zionistic leadership. The remarkable development in Palestine calls forth an article in the Wall Street Journal, a conservative sheet, under date of April 14, 1933, entitled "New Phoenicia Arising. Huge Oil Pipe Lines Bring Boom to Cities in Palestine." Under this caption the remarkable growth of Palestine is given. William Zuckerman in Harper's Magazine speaks of the Palestinian boom as a modern miracle. Truly Israel's time is at hand.
(Continued on next page)
|
|
|
|
|