CHAPTER THREE

EARLY RAYS OF MESSIANIC GLORY


I. THE SEED OF THE WOMAN

THE revelation of God begins with a glorious statement, sublime beyond human comprehension, concerning the creation of the universe by the omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient and eternal God (Gen. 1:1). That the earth was in a perfect condition when created is evident from the following passage of Isaiah: "The God that formed the earth and made it, that established it and created it not a waste, that formed it to be inhabited." But according to Genesis 1:2 it became a desolation and a waste. Evidently some great calamity overtook it. The account of its being reconstructed by the Lord during a period of six days is graphically described in the first chapter of Genesis.

After it had been prepared as a fit habitation, the Lord created¹ man to have dominion over it. This history is recorded in the second chapter of this marvelous book of beginnings.

After man's creation and his being placed in control of the earth, according to the Biblical account, the great enemy of both God and man,
הַשָּׂטָן, by craftiness and lying deceived him and thus wrenched him from this great heritage. With this turn of affairs came the blackness of darkness over this primeval couple, the crown and glory of the Almighty's creative activity. They with a vivid consciousness of their sin and the awful consequences were driven from the presence of God to pursue their course without the previous daily communion and fellowship with their Creator.

The Lord in His mercy and goodness, however, did not leave them without hope of deliverance from this fallen and degraded state. In the pronouncement of the judgment upon Satan and the human race there also appears the cheering promise that the conflict, just begun, will eventually result in the triumph of man kind over Satan because "he (the seed of the woman) shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel" ² (Gen. 3:15).

After due allowance has been made for figurative language and the so-called oriental embellishment in the narration of the fall, there remain, as Professor Delitzsch points out, in the history of paradise the following bed-rock facts: (1) "that there was a demoniacal evil one, before evil had taken possession of man; (2) that this demoniacal evil one was the power of temptation before which man fell; (3) that God after mankind had fallen punished them, but at the same time opened a way of salvation, by which they could again secure communion with God; (4) that He placed before them in prospect the victory over that power of temptation through which they had lost the communion with God in Paradise." Any theology that does not recognize these indisputable facts cannot, in a satisfactory manner, account for the simple daily experiences of the race. These facts constitute the dark background to all human history.

Since man was driven from the garden of Eden, he has realized that there exists between him and his Maker an impassable gulf. To this grim, ghastly fact the legends of all the nations of antiquity supply unimpeachable evidence. Our own souls yield indisputable corroborative testimony. The universal cry of humanity is for the bridging of the gap, the removal of the barrier between us and our Creator, and the reconciliation of the race to God. The divine response to this heart-yearning is found in the original promise that the seed of the woman will eventually crush the serpent's head--the promise of victory over the enemy of the race.

The expression, "the seed of the woman," is very striking, in that it never occurs elsewhere. According to the Biblical narrative, posterity is never reckoned after the female but always after the male. A glance at the many genealogies in the Scriptures confirms this fact. But here the conqueror of man's great enemy is to be "the seed of the woman." The fact that he is thus designated is a clear indication that there is something about his personality that makes him "the seed of the woman" in a peculiar sense that can be said of no other one.

Upon the serpent and his master, to whom he yielded himself a ready tool, the curse fell. That there is a spirit so very sinister and evil who conceals his identity, decoys the unsuspecting into his traps, and uses them in his deceptive designs is abundantly proved by the Scriptures. (See Job 1, 2; Zech. 3:1-5.)

The outcome of the struggle and the character of the defeat which "the seed of the woman" will inflict upon His adversary is represented as a crushing blow upon the head, whereas that which the adversary does to Him is as a slight wound upon the heel
. שׁוּף is the verb used and, unlike שָׁאַף, takes a double accusative. Its evident force is seen by the fact that the Targum uses it for דִּכָּא to crush; טָחַן to grind to powder; and שָׁחַק to pulverize. This prophecy, the first in the revelation of God, graphically sets before us the outcome of the age-long conflict: the enemy of man lying prostrate upon the ground, having received a crushing blow upon his head, and the victor standing above him with only a flesh wound upon his heel. Professor Delitzsch correctly declares: "only when we translate it: 'He (the seed of the woman) shall crush thee on the head' . . ., does the sentence include the definite promise of victory over the serpent, which, because it suffers the deadly tread, seeks to defend itself, and sinking under the treader is mortally wounded (Gen. 49:17)." The goal toward which all history is moving is here announced in this graphic, cryptic oracle.

That the ancient synagogue interpreted this passage as a messianic prediction is clear from the Palestinian Targum which testifies that in Genesis 3:15 is the promise of the healing of the serpent's bite "at the end of the days, in the days of King Messiah."

"And I will put enmity between thee and the WOMAN, and between the seed of thy sons, and between the SEED of her sons; and it shall be when the sons of the WOMAN keep the commandments of the LAW, they will be prepared to smite thee on thy HEAD; but if they forsake the commandments of the LAW, thou wilt be prepared to wound them in the heel. Nevertheless for them there shall be a MEDICINE; and they shall make a REMEDY for the heel in the days of the King MESHIHA."--Targum Palestine (or Jerusalem).

The Palestinian Midrash (Bereshith rabba XII) declares, "The things which God created perfect since man sinned have become corrupt
(נתקלקלו) and do not return to their proper condition until the son of Perez (i.e. according to Gen. xxxviii:29; Ruth iv:18ff, the Messiah out of the tribe of Judah) comes." This interpretation correctly makes Messiah the restorer of the primitive order and the reconciler of the estranged world to God. Onkelos together with others translate as follows:

"And I will put enmity between thy son and her SON; HE will remember thee and what thou didst to HIM from (at) the beginning, and thou shalt be observant unto HIM at the end."--Targum Onkelos.

"When Adam saw the darkness it is added, he was greatly afraid, saying, 'Perhaps HE of whom it is written, "HE shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise HIS HEEL," cometh to molest and attack me,' and he said: 'Surely the darkness shall cover me.'"--Shemoth Rabbah, 12 (ed. Warsh. p. 24b).

"As thou wentest forth for the SALVATION OF THY PEOPLE by the hands of the MESHIHA the SON OF DAVID, who shall WOUND SATAN who is the head, the King and Prince of the house of the wicked, and shall . . . (overturn) all his strength, power, policy and dominion." --R. David Kimchi.

II. FIRST ECHOES OF THE PROMISE

A. Adam's Naming His Wife

God warned man that on the day he partook of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil מוֹת תָּמוּת "dying thou shalt surely die" (literal tr. of Gen. 2:17). Adam thoroughly understood the significance of the warning, for God always makes Himself clear and easily intelligible in all matters that refer to conduct and the consequences of disobedience. When, however, he disregarded the sacred prohibition and ate of the forbidden fruit, a new revelation was given him which did not make void the sentence of death, but which opened before his bewildered gaze a great vista of hope of final and complete deliverance through the seed of the woman. His faith in this promise took on its first recorded concrete form in his selection of a name for his wife--חַוָּה Eve "because she was the mother of all living" (Gen. 3:20). Therefore, in spite of the sentence of death, Adam's choice of this name is evidence of his conviction that Eve was to become the mother of the human race which should live and to which ultimate victory should be given by "the seed of the woman" when He crushes the head of the serpent--the adversary.

On this point Delitzsch declares:

"The creative promise of the propagation of the race is not to be abolished by the fall, but on the contrary to subserve the deliverance of man, the victory over the power of evil being promised to the seed of the woman. Consequently, in the presence of the death with which he is threatened, the woman has become to Adam the pledges of both the continuance and the victory of the race. It is therefore an act of faith, an embracing of the promise interwoven in the decree of wrath, that he calls his wife's name
חַוָּה. This חַיָּה=חַוָּה (according to the formations עַוָּה ,חַוָּה ) means life, LXX. ζωή, not preserver (comp. חַיָּה, xix. 32, 34), i.e. propagator of life, Symm. ζωογόνος, for the rejection of the מ, in the part. of Piel, is unusual, and only occurs in the part. of Pual, and perhaps in the part. Phil. of verbs עו. The woman is called life, as a fountain of life from which the life of the human race is continually renewed, just as Noah, נֹחַ, is called rest as the bringer of rest (Kohler). The name חַוָּה is not a name like the God-given one γυνή = genetrix and femina, which Corssen derives from feo (fuo, φύω), Curtius from fe-lare to suckle, but a proper name which, as mnemosynon gratiae promissae (Melanchthon), declares the special importance of this first of women to the human race and its history. Hence it is explained, retrospectively from its fulfilment: for she became אֵם כָּל־חָי, a mother (ancestress) of every individual in whom the race lives on; the life of the race which proceeded from her is, in the midst of the death of individuals, ever reoriginating, and fulfilment has thus sealed the meaning of this name of faith and hope."--New Commentary on Genesis, Vol. I, pp. 169, 170.

This interpretation is confirmed by the ancient synagogue.

"And Adam knew his wife which DESIRED THE ANGEL, and she conceived and bare Cain, and said, 'I have obtained THE MAN, the ANGEL OF THE LORD.' "--Targum Jonathan.

"And Adam knew Eve, his wife, and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, 'I have acquired THE MAN from before the Lord' "--Targum Palestine.

"And Adam knew Eve, his wife, and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said 'I have acquired THE MAN from before the Lord.' " Targum Onkelos. "R.'Tanhuma said in the name of R. Samuel: 'Eve had respect to that "SEED" which is coming from another place. And who is this? This is the Messiah, the King.'"--Ber. Rabbah (23 ed. Warsh. p. 45b).

"It is not written that we may preserve a Son from our father, but SEED from our Father.' This is the SEED that is coming from another place. And who is this? This is the KING MESSIAH."--Ber. Rabbah (51 ed. Warsh. p. 95a) on Gen. 19:32.

B. Eve's Ejaculation

The second echo is found in the expression of ecstasy voiced by Eve concerning the birth of her first child. Moses informs us that she exclaimed קָנִיתִי אִישׁ אֶת־יְהוָה "I have gotten a man with the help of the Lord" (Gen. 4:1 American Revised Version). The words, the help of, are not in the original text. The sentence literally rendered is: "I have gotten a man, the Lord" or "I have gotten a man, even the Lord." The force of the words and the construction are so very strong that the Jerusalem Targum renders them: "I have gotten a man, the Angel of the Lord."

An objection is brought against this translation, in that it inserts the expression Angel, whereas this heavenly visitor is not introduced into the patriarchal history until later. This position is based upon the argument from silence, which reasoning is, as admitted by all logicians, very unreliable and often fallacious. The Scriptures do not claim to record every event, but to preserve the history of redemption and those things vital to the development of its theme; hence it is possible that this Angel of the Lord could have appeared without any record of the event.³

An objection urged against the plain, literal translation of Eve's statement is that "the terms of the primitive promise do not give any occasion for such an expression" as that which she voiced. This objection, like the one just examined, is based upon the argument from silence. It is not to be supposed that Moses in this brief account has recorded every word that was spoken by the Lord on this occasion. No written account of a conversation is so full as the original, spoken language. The recorded discourse is of necessity greatly condensed and expressed, comparatively speaking, in few words.

Her outburst of joy and hope, when her first-born arrived, shows clearly her interpretation of the original promise. Hence we are to examine it closely and allow it to give its natural, normal meaning. In order to verify the rendering, we shall compare it with other parallel statements. The sentence following Eve's exclamation throws light upon its syntax.
וַתֹּסֶף לָלֶדֶת אֶת־אָחִיו אֶת־הָבֶל "And again she bear his brother Abel" (Gen. 4:2). Here Abel is in apposition with brother, the object of the verb. Thus it is with our sentence. אִיש man is the direct object of the verb and in apposition with it is the word יְהוָה. Just as Abel identifies the brother whose birth is mentioned, the sacred name of God identifies the person who is born. A parallel to this sentence is found in Genesis 6:10: וַיּוֹלֶד נֹחַ שְׁלֹשָׁה בָנִים אֶת־שֵׁם אֶת־חָם וְאֶת־יָפֶת׃ "And Noah begat three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth." In this sentence sons is the object of the verb though אֶת, the sign of the direct object, is not prefixed to it, as is the case with our sentence, but this sign is joined to each of the names of the sons and shows that these are their names. Another excellent example is found in Genesis 26:34: וַיְהִי עֵשָׂו בֶּן־אַרְבָּעִים שָׁנָה וַיִּקַּח אִשָּׁה אֶת־יְהוּדִית בַּת־בְּאֵרִי הַחִתִּי "And when Esau was forty years old he took to wife Judith the daughter of Beeri the Hittite." אִשָּׁה is the direct object of the verb without the ordinary sign of the accusative case and Judith is in apposition with it and is prefixed with the sign of the object. Hence this is the normal, natural way of rendering the statement in the light of the context. No other translation is possible. This passage is an exact parallel to the statement made by Eve. The syntax being similar, only for theological reasons have objections been brought against taking the normal meaning of her words. Inasmuch as these objections are based upon pure speculation, theological and philosophical, which in turn rests upon the precarious argument from silence, they can have no logical force against the normal, natural, and grammatical meaning of the sentence. Therefore to render her words, "I have gotten a man, even the Lord," is the only course open to us.

The conclusion reached in the last paragraph shows us that Eve understood the promise made to her as including the supernatural entrance of the Lord into the human sphere. As noted above, the peculiar expression, "the seed of the woman," implies something above the natural. Eve's expression, though incorrect when applied to Cain, harmonizes with the plain meaning of this unique promise and throws further light upon it. When one con-siders thoughtfully the promise and Eve's language with their implications, he is led to the conclusion that the original promise as spoken to Eve and as understood by her involved the entrance of the Lord into the human realm by His assuming the form of a child and by His being born of a woman. From this conclusion there can be no escape. The facts in general are stated or clearly implied but the details are withheld--awaiting a time of further revelation.


C. The Beginning of Public Worship

It has been aptly said that the blood of the martyrs is the seed of the kingdom. Abel, the faithful servant of God whom his brother slew, did more in perpetuating the truth concerning the coming of the world Redeemer by his death than by his life. Hence in the days of Seth, the seed appointed of the Lord instead of Abel (Gen. 4:25), men began to gather around the promise of the coming Redeemer and to call upon the name of the Lord יְהוָה (Gen. 4:26), who by His promise of the seed of the woman had inspired faith in their hearts. The religious community was in those days a silent yet effective testimony to the messianic hope.

Men in their present condition long to be delivered not only from the bondage of sin and wickedness but also from the curse of death. The perpetual question that will not be downed is whether or not there is a life of happiness and bliss beyond this one. To answer this question once for all the Lord removed His faithful servant, Enoch the seventh from Adam, from this sinful world--not through the usual exit of death but by translation. "And Enoch walked with God: and he was not; for God took him" (Gen. 5:24).
וַיִּתְהַלֵּךְ חֲנוֹךְ אֶת־הָאֱלֹהִים וְאֵינֶנּוּ כִּי־לָקַח אֹתוֹ אֱלֹהִים׃ Death, since the Fall, is the law of nature; but God who is the author of all nature can hold any or all laws in abeyance and render them inoperative, if it please Him, in order to forward His plans. The miraculous removal of Enoch from this realm of the curse shows that, had man "proved true in the probation of free will," he could have passed from this life into the higher and eternal realm of existence and bliss. The translation of both Enoch and Elijah so that they did not see death is a prophecy in act of the final removal of God's faithful servants into the higher realm when it pleases Him.

The messianic hope was kept alive in the little religious community of the faithful and was fanned into a bright and shining light by the fervent lives of such men as Enoch whose persevering, consistent life and marvelous end stirred the hearts of all the servants of God.

D. Noah a Type of the Expected Comforter

In Lamech, the seventh from Adam in the line of Cain, the worldly tendency and ungodliness rose to the heights of blasphemous arrogance and total disregard for God and man. Under such conditions religious indifference held high carnival. In amazing contrast with this group of worldly, irreligious people, the descendants of Adam through Seth stand out as bold witnesses to the truth of God. Especially is this statement true with reference to Enosh, Enoch, and Lamech, the third, the seventh, and the ninth from Adam. Lamech in the Sethitic line hoped that in his son Noah, the tenth from Adam, would be fulfilled and realized the deliverance promised at the time of the Fall. This fact shines forth through the name Noah which he chose for the child, and which indicates his hope that "the period of the curse would come to a comforting conclusion" through this son. "And he called his name Noah, saying, This same shall comfort us in our work and in the toil of our hands, which cometh from (or because of) the ground which the Lord hath cursed." The name Noah is a substantive form derived from נוּחַ which primarily means to rest, to settle down and remain. God rested after His toil (Ex. 20:11); cattle were to be allowed to rest from their toil on the Sabbath (Ex. 23:12); and the Jews in the days of Esther opposed their enemies and then had rest from them (Esther 9:16). From these and many other examples that might be given it is clear that נוּחַ means to enjoy rest by being freed from exhausting labors, irksome duties, and unpleasant conditions, and, as in the present case, by being delivered from the wearisomeness of toil entailed by the curse.

In naming his son, Lamech stated that he had chosen this special word because "this same shall comfort us from our work," etc. Thus the father connected the hope of comfort expressed by
מְנַחֵם with the word נוּחַ. The former of these words means to comfort or console; the latter, to repose, be quiet, have rest. In the nature of the case, the comfort comes only after cessation from the toil caused by the curse is granted. By some means or agency, which the Lord did not see fit to record, Lamech knew that his son would comfort the human race, not with words, but by delivering it from the curse. A comparison of his language with that spoken by the Lord in the original promise concerning "the seed of the woman" shows that the former is an unmistakable echo of the latter. Such a study also proves positively that the patriarchs understood "the seed of the woman" as indicating a man who would bring the desired deliverance from the curse.

The sacred record shows that Noah wrought, by preparing the ark, a deliverance for the race but not the salvation promised originally. But what he did was a type and a shadow of the great deliverance that "the seed of the woman" would bring to the human family. This fact is clearly seen in one of the names applied to Messiah by the ancient synagogue. The venerable rabbinic designation of Messiah as
מְנַחֵם M'nahem is doubtless based upon its use in Lamentations 1:2, 9, 17, 21. The prophet in these verses laments the fact that Zion is lying in waste and that there is no one to comfort her, that is, to comfort her by bringing deliverance. In verse 16 of this same chapter there seems to be a very definite reference to one who can properly be called the Comforter of Zion and who is to refresh her soul. Here the complaint is that this one is far from her while she is lying, as it were, prostrate. This passage in the midst of a poem lamenting her hopeless state is undoubtedly an echo of the language of Lamech concerning Noah and depends upon the meaning which it there has for its force in this passage. As has already been seen, Lamech's statement shows that he who brings the comfort does so by delivering the servants of God from the curse upon the ground. Hence, since Noah did not fulfill the expectations aroused by his father's language, it is certain that he was simply a type of the great Comforter of the race and that what he did was only a shadow of the final and complete deliverance by the Comforter. In view of the partial and imperfect fulfillment of the expectations of this passage in the past, we may be bold in asserting that the language will be fulfilled literally and completely when the great Comforter, whom Noah foreshadowed, comes.

Since the curse was placed upon the ground by the decree of the Almighty God, it is certain that an ordinary man cannot lift it. Only God Himself or one whom He especially empowers can remove this universal judgment. Confirmation of this position is found and further light is thrown upon this general subject in the predictions of Isaiah. In chapters 51 and 52 the prophet discusses the time when Israel shall be restored to fellowship with her God and shall become the head of the nations (Deut. 28:13). At that time "the ransomed of the Lord shall return, and come with singing unto Zion; and everlasting joy shall be upon their heads: they shall obtain gladness and joy; and sorrow and sighing shall flee away" (Isa. 51:11). Such a condition as here described presupposes the lifting of the curse. This quotation is immediately followed by the words of the Lord:
אָנֹכִי אָנֹכִי הוּא מְנַחֶמְכֶם "I, even I, am he that comforteth you." Here מְנַחֵם is an echo of the prediction of Lamech concerning Noah and not only has the force of the original statement, which it graphically reproduces, but also completes the picture of Messiah and His redemptive work, which is roughly sketched in the Torah. As has already been seen, Lamech's portrait melts away and gives place to that of the great Comforter whom Noah typified.

It is to be noted the prophet declared that God Himself is the one who will comfort Zion. The repetition of the Words, I, even I, is employed for the express purpose of calling attention to the fact that it is the Lord, and not some prophet or representative of His, who brings the long-desired comfort, not only to Zion, but also to the entire human race. His work, as set forth in this passage, was clearly reflected in the language of Lamech.

Noah, the early type of the great Comforter of the race, was granted a view into the future and accurately foretold the three great sections of the human race into which it subsequently divided, the special sphere of each, and its contribution to the world. Upon Canaan is pronounced the curse of servitude; to Japheth is given far-flung political power and dominance; and to Shem is granted preeminence in spiritual affairs. True to this prophetic outline, the descendants of Ham have been the slave nations of earth, the posterity of Japheth has held and wielded the sceptre of political preeminence and power over the peoples of the globe, and the offspring of Shem has made its contribution to the world in the moral, spiritual, and religious realms. As we shall see in the following section, it was from the Semitic branch of the race that Abraham, the father of the Hebrew people, sprang. To him God gave the promise that all families of the earth should be blessed in his seed. In perfect alignment with this announced plan, all that has really blessed the peoples of earth has come through the Hebrew people.


Footnotes:

¹ Dr. Ira M. Price, in The Monuments and the Old Testament (new edition), says, "Most of the great nations of antiquity have preserved legends or traditions of the creation of the world, of the origin of man, of the fall, and of the deluge." The Seven Tablets of Creation constitute the Babylonian recension of the primitive creation narrative and, when stripped of their grossly heathen elements and polytheism, correspond with fair accuracy to the inspired Biblical record. The Sumerians, the aborigines of the Tigris-Euphrates valley, likewise have preserved to us an account of creation, which also confirms the Scriptural narration. These traditions are universal among primitive races.

When these primitive legends are properly deleted of all evident heathen excrescences and scientifically evaluated, the imperishable elements common to all are found to bear unimpeachable testimony to the accuracy and the reliability of the Biblical accounts.

There evidently lie behind these early traditions, distorted and corrupted as they are, the actual historical facts. The Biblical account, free from all irrational legendary elements and stated in universal language which is easily and readily understood by all peoples regardless of their state of civilization and the peculiar superstitions and conflicting scientific theories in vogue, commends itself to the thinking, truth-loving people as an absolutely accurate and infallible account of what actually did occur.

² The Scriptural account of the fall of man received extraordinary confirmation in the Myth of Adapa which is found in four Babylonian fragments. Three of these clay tablets are from the library of Ashurbanipal of Nineveh and one from the archives of King Amenhotep IV of Egypt at Tel el Amarna.

Additional confirmation of the fall of man is found in the famous Temptation cylinder-seal. In the center of this picture is a tree on which fruit is hanging. On opposite sides of the tree two persons are seated and behind one of them stands the upright crooked form of a serpent. This primitive piece of art is a silent witness to the truthfulness of the Biblical narrative.

³ The critical analysis of the Torah assumes that the sacred name of the Lord
יְהוָה was never known until the time of the exodus. This presumption is based upon a failure to note carefully what Exodus 6:2,3 says: "And God spake unto Moses, and said unto him, I am the Lord: and I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, as אֵל שַׁדָּי God Almighty; but by my name יְהוָה the Lord I was not known to them." This statement does not say that God did not in primitive times reveal himself as יְהוָה but simply affirms that he did not make himself known to these three patriarchs by this, His memorial name. There was a revelation of God communicated to the race before the time of Moses, for Genesis 26:5 quotes the Lord as saying: "Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws. ..." A number of divine laws are quoted and referred to in the book of Genesis which gives an historical account of events antedating the giving of the law at Sinai. It seems from Genesis 14 that the knowledge of the true God was kept alive in the little kingdom over which Melchizedek reigned. Throughout the rest of the world this knowledge seems to have faded gradually from the minds of the people. It is likely, and even probable, that in the primitive revelation God made Himself known by His memorial name, since it occurs in the earliest chapters of the Torah. When the Lord called Abraham, he lived in a heathen environment. To him, under these conditions, God revealed Himself as God Almighty. Also to his son and grandson He revealed Himself as such and awaited the time when He would enter into covenant with all of their descendants to disclose Himself by His holy memorial name.


(Continued on next page)